Balancing Partnership and Accountability
Balancing Partnership and Accountability
Civil society organizations (CSOs) play a crucial role in driving systems change within government to improve the lives of citizens. However, many CSOs face a significant challenge: how to effectively partner with government while still holding it accountable. This learning brief summarizes the reflections of several Co-Impact Partners on navigating this delicate balance and provides practical strategies for CSOs to navigate this complex relationship.
Why Balancing Partnership and Accountability is Difficult
For many CSOs, a core strategy to achieve their mission involves holding governments accountable through various methods, such as public awareness campaigns, advocacy, performance data collection, strategic litigation, policy engagement, and community mobilization. However, CSOs are increasingly recognizing the importance of collaborating with governments to drive meaningful systems change. This evolving approach can create tensions, particularly when accountability efforts are perceived as criticism of the government, potentially complicating the development of effective partnerships.
Governments may perceive advocacy efforts by CSOs as a betrayal, especially when these organizations publicly criticize government policies while working closely with them. Governments often expect partnerships to involve full alignment and discretion, with any criticism communicated privately rather than publicly. Open criticism by CSOs may be seen as a breach of trust or a deviation from agreed-upon terms, undermining the effectiveness and impact of the partnership. This perception can strain the relationship, potentially reducing government cooperation and support.